Total Credits: 1.5 including 1.5 General
The defendant has a constitutional and statutory right to a “speedy trial.” Delays and continuances are common, and, in most cases, create no speedy-trial problem because they occurred with the agreement or without the objection of the defense. But when substantial speedy-trial problems arise, the stakes can be dire because the remedy is the dismissal of the case, something which can be very difficult to explain to victims and the public. This presentation will review the basic operation of the constitutional and statutory speedy-trial rights as to felonies and will explore best practices in ensuring that continuance entries do their job and toll the speedy-trial clock. The presentation will also discuss the new “last chance” provisions applicable to speedy-trial motion practice that took effect on 4-4-23.
Speedy Trial 2024 — Landmines and Pitfalls But Now With “Last Chance” Saving Provision (4.7 MB) | 73 Pages | Available after Purchase |
In 1983, Steven L. Taylor received a B.A. degree in History from the University of Michigan. In 1986, he received a J.D. degree from the Ohio State University. He is a former law clerk for the Ohio Court of Appeals, Tenth Appellate District, and for Chief Justice Thomas J. Moyer of the Ohio Supreme Court.
Steve served for many years as an Assistant Prosecuting Attorney and then as Chief Counsel of the Appellate Division of the Franklin County Prosecutor’s Office. Since 2009, he has served as the editor of the monthly Ohio Prosecuting Attorneys Association Case Digest and is now the Legal Research and Staff Counsel for the Association.